Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mischief Makers (Film)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 22:13, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Mischief Makers (Film)[edit]
- Mischief Makers (Film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable searches for Mischief Makers (film) in google give up other results. Should be deleted and instead mentioned on her wikipedia page. Should not be a redirect since there are other films with the same name. ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 20:46, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. czar · · 21:16, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. The awards are not notable. As far as I can tell, this is a screenplay, and not a film as implied by the article title so redirecting would be misleading. And there is nothing to merge as the Elise Jackson article already mentions this. In fact, I'm rather dubious about her notability. -- Whpq (talk) 16:24, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Whpq. — Joaquin008 (talk) 10:56, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. As per Whpq. 1292simon (talk) 12:18, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note - After some review, I've nominated Elise Jackson for deletion. -- Whpq (talk) 12:59, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.