Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mirza Ali

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:39, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mirza Ali[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Extremely vague article with no sources, barely any real biographical information, no further details in the Persian and Arabic language pages, no detail on this supposedly very impressive manual. Mirza Ali is also an extremely common part of many names - without further detail, sourcing and establishing notability seem unlikely. Kazamzam (talk) 01:13, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Kazamzam (talk) 01:13, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the article says there are no sources, other than this one. I'm not sure what they expect us to do. It doesn't even have in-line sourcing so we can verify what's given here. Fails GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 03:15, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete How can we keep an unreferenced so-called "biography" about a person that nothing is known about, other than that he wrote a "therapeutic treatise"? If the treatise has received significant coverage in reliable sources, perhaps an article about the treatise could be written. But there is no evidence of that in the current version of the article. Cullen328 (talk) 04:27, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:46, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, absolutely nothing to be gleaned here. Mooonswimmer 20:04, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:BIO and unsourced material is also concerning. Belichickoverbrady (talk) 03:57, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. We can't keep information unless it is reliably verified somewhere. Fad Ariff (talk) 13:18, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.