Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mirja Dorny

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 18:44, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mirja Dorny[edit]

Mirja Dorny (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Definitely fails WP:NFOOTBALL and I'm not seeing enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.

While searching "Mirja Dorny", I found an article about co-operatives with a brief comment from her but nothing more; the article is not in any way focused on her and there is little in there that is actually about her. Searches of "Mirja Kothe" bring up a lot of Fansoccer match reports, none of which contain significant coverage, and this routine announcement about staying at a third tier club and another article about her playing for Harpen, with two brief quotes. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:03, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:03, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:03, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:03, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:03, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:07, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom Noah 💬 18:09, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete the article completely fails GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:51, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I can't really tell, but I think there is some good merits, here, I can hardly understand the German article, it's unsourced. But the content has come from somewhere, there maybe more juice out there. Govvy (talk) 19:31, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. -Cupper52Discuss! 19:46, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 21:46, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.