Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miriam Smith (mayor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:57, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Miriam Smith (mayor)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is a general consensus that articles on suburban mayors aren't notable, and that this incredibly short stub still claimed she was mayor (four years after her resignation) until a couple of hours ago suggests non-notability. The Drover's Wife (talk) 02:26, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete mayors of places that a suburbs as the term is used in Australia are not notable for such, and there is no other claim to notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:52, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 03:47, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 03:47, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. If something genuinely substantive could be said about her mayoralty, and genuinely solid reliable source coverage about her could be shown to support it, then I'd be willing to reconsider this — but mayors of Australian suburbs aren't automatically entitled to keep single-sourced stubs which just say that "she exists, the end". Bearcat (talk) 05:03, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable. Acnetj (talk) 09:34, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete small city mayor with local/regional coverage.E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:04, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence of significant coverage, and suburban mayors do not qualify for [[WP:POLITICIAN]. Frickeg (talk) 05:47, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.