Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miriam Slozberg
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:55, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Miriam Slozberg[edit]
- Miriam Slozberg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not Notable. No reliable secondary sources other than three radio interviews. No reviews of her books. Jojalozzo 21:41, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - of those three "radio" programs, at least two look to be solely internet-distributed and on distribution systems that are for-hire or are simply conduits provided to their users, and thus are WP:SPS. Article created by an apparent commercial spammer. --Nat Gertler (talk) 23:21, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. czar · · 00:25, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. czar · · 00:25, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Sources are unreliable, and include blogtalk "radio" and user-generated forums. Fails WP:GNG, possible WP:SPS. HillbillyGoat (talk) 04:04, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No xcoverage in independent reliable sources. - Whpq (talk) 16:17, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. — Joaquin008 (talk) 20:48, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for failing WP:AUTHOR, WP:BK, and WP:GNG. Qworty (talk) 23:20, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:SPAM ring of paid editors. [1] [2] PeterWesco (talk) 02:14, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.