Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miracle monocle
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 23:44, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Miracle monocle[edit]
- Miracle monocle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable journal Corvus cornixtalk 04:47, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, can't find secondary sources to confirm notability, borderline {{db-corp}} candidate, depending on how you define "organization", given the utter lack of text even claiming why this journal is important or noteworthy. --Jayron32 04:57, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no indication that is meets any notability guideline. VQuakr (talk) 05:19, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No indication of notability. --Joaquin008 (talk) 16:14, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I am not seeing coverage to indicate notability. --DanielRigal (talk) 19:27, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.