Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minus Ten and Counting

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 04:00, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Minus Ten and Counting[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Filk album that apparently sold 2500 total copies (plus bootlegs) and all the refs are blog/forum. Appears to not meet WP:NMUSIC Gaijin42 (talk) 20:44, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Absolutely no evidence of notability. Even the personal blog used as a reference is only speculating that the album was "apparently immensely popular". ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 06:08, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I found a mention in this book on Google Books, but that was about the best I could do. It does get a couple more trivial mentions in media studies books, but that's not enough to satisfy the GNG. If further offline coverage exists (and someone can locate the sources), then the article can be recreated. I guess it could be redirected somewhere, but I wouldn't really know where. Filk music doesn't make any mention of it. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:29, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.