Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minu Kurian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 19:32, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Minu Kurian[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an article on living person, but has no references. The only references cited is a page with her photos, with no text. This article was already deleted (trough proposed deletions), but the author recreated it. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:17, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 November 25. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 09:13, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Although the article is poorly written the person is a well known actress in malayalam and tamil film industry. --കാർത്തുമ്പി (talk) 14:56, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:13, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:24, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The author, User talk:Anjooraan has half a dozen notifications of copyright violation on their user page and has a discussion open on them at wp:ANI. As I'm the one that opened the ANI discussion (and nominated another of their articles for wp:Speedy about ten minutes ago, so I'm checking the rest of their articles and have just added evidence of plagiarism to another deletion discussion), my preference is for a delete without prejudice to be on the safe side - but this is on the merits of the case for just that reason as I've yet to find evidence this specific page was plagiarised and know absolutely nothing about Mayalam film. Neonchameleon (talk) 23:15, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.