Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miniforum.org (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Scott (talk) 16:35, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Miniforum.org

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Miniforum.org
• Articles for deletion/Miniforum.org (2nd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Miniforum.org (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The reason this was kept at the last AFD was on the basis of the 2005 unreferenced claim that it is the third most popular site in China in the Alexa rankings. I don't have a subscription to Alexa but the free alternative (link) shows that it's actually way down in the 10,000s. Last time I checked, a high Alexa ranking alone was not reason enough to satisfy either WP:NWEB or WP:GNG. SITH (talk) 16:25, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

• Delete - nom is correct. There aren't any good secondary sources, and I don't think a one-time high alexa score (if it was!) would demonstrate reliability. I'm not sure if its GNG, NWEB or NORG that has to be satisfied, but it fails to do either, afaict. Nosebagbear (talk) 17:52, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 21:25, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 21:25, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete: WP:GNG not pass per subject. We don't publish those article, which depend on Primary sources. No news: [1]. Siddiqsazzad001 <Talk/> 15:33, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.