Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mini-Con

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Transformers. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:04, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mini-Con[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This fails to establish notability. TTN (talk) 02:30, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 02:30, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Artw (talk) 15:26, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Artw (talk) 15:34, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect: to Transformers. Oh my freaking god. Even if this fringe toy was remotely able to meet the GNG, which it isn't, this article is about twenty times too long. I commend the author to put this on his own fansite. Ravenswing 10:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or, if anyone cares, merge it somewhere. This doesn't warrant its own article. I think Ravenswing's assessment is perfect, so I'm going to repeat it: "Oh my freaking god. Even if this fringe toy was remotely able to meet the GNG, which it isn't, this article is about twenty times too long." Josh Milburn (talk) 22:52, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —MRD2014 (talk • contribs) 21:49, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I see no need to redirect or merge. Subject is trivial. The only reason to redirect would be to prevent recreation, and that can be handled via CSD G4 and salting if it occurs. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:32, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.