Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mingo Chin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:57, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mingo Chin[edit]

Mingo Chin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability, Non-notable person, badly unreliable press releases.89ezagonoszkommunistanacionalista64 (talk) 11:04, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:00, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak KeepThe sources on the article are definitely plumped out with social media posts but a few of them are reliable sources; it's a borderline case, I'll grant, but I prefer to err on the side of keeping when it's borderline. Simonm223 (talk) 13:05, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, perhaps speedily, as entirely promotional under WP:TNT, WP:G11, with no prejudice against immediate recreation. — Alpha3031 (tc) 13:20, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. — Alpha3031 (tc) 13:22, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. — Alpha3031 (tc) 13:22, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — Alpha3031 (tc) 13:22, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — Alpha3031 (tc) 13:22, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 11:01, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I went over the sources a second time and did a quick perusal of Chinese content I could access and have changed my mind. Not even marginally notable. Simonm223 (talk) 12:03, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete If he's the "youngest young hacker in China", you'd think we could get one English-language reference to help establish notability... --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:56, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.