Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ming Toy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. According to the last comment, a disambig would be more in place here. So I am not leaving a redirect. If anyone is interested in merging, let me know so that I can provide the content. Tone 14:01, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ming Toy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails general notability guideline, no third-party sources provided. *** Crotalus *** 16:27, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

merge to a suitable combined list, as usual for characters in fiction. DGG ( talk ) 01:54, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 02:15, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Ming Toy is the name of a number of prize-winning dogs dating back to the 1920s, and a variety of characters in plays and movies, also dating back to the 20s. The only thing I can't find is substantive analysis of this particular Ming Toy character. This Left Behind series must be awful, racist, derivative crap. This Ming Toy article should be deleted with extreme prejudice. Abductive (reasoning) 10:47, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.