Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mind-N-Magick

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 01:02, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mind-N-Magick[edit]

De-prod'd and re-prod'd article. Since that's against WP:PROD, I'm sending it here. Original nominator's rationale was "Does not assert notability per WP:WEB". JLaTondre 00:33, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete Alexa rank of about 60k, 51 unique Google links, <1000 Google hits for "Mind-n-Magick" + "search engine". However, I couldn't find any independent sources writing about it, nor any major awards, so for now I'm saying a delete. --Wafulz 01:07, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:WEB; if this warrants some minor mention as part of another pagan/wicca/whatever article, I trust they'll take care of it. My Alt Account 01:24, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:WEB, doesn't assert notability (that was my prod). Melchoir 01:25, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:WEB and possibly WP:ADS. --Supermath 02:49, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:WEB. Michael 03:01, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:V. "If an article topic has no reputable, reliable, third-party sources, Wikipedia should not have an article on that topic." Robert A.West (Talk) 06:20, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Blatant WP:SPAM. --S0uj1r0 07:46, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above reasons.UberCryxic 19:17, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.