Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mimi Fuenzalida (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Fram (talk) 12:44, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mimi Fuenzalida[edit]

This article was previously nominated for deletion (Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mimi_Fuenzalida), the result was No consensus, default to keep. Subsequently, it has been confirmed that the creator of the article, who also voted, was misrepresenting them self. They are a sock of the company that is the subject of a COI case at Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#MetaphorEnt. They did not identify the affiliation during the vote and made numerous false allegations in their comment.

Non-notability per WP:BIO. Minor actor with one appearance on a television show. None of the movies she has been in appear notable.

COI-affected editors have been instructed to mention any affiliation with the firms involved when commenting. BlueAzure (talk) 17:38, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. —BlueAzure (talk) 17:45, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Subject has been a supporting actress in the films and televion shows she has appeared in, no more. This is not enough to meet WP:BIO criteria. On a side note, WP:COI problems are not grounds for deletion. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 18:10, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. COI problems are relevant when they account for the existence of the article in the first place. This appears to be actor management using Wikipedia to promote new talent, not an encyclopedia entry, and I don't see enough here for notability. -Lciaccio (talk) 09:59, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Article was created as part of a batch, generated in COI fashion apparently by people working for Metaphor Entertainment. The reference list seems to only include such websites as IMDB.com, inbaseline.com and ginfo.pl which can't be considered reliable sources because they allow user submission of data. There don't seem to be any sourced comments on her work from which a proper biographical entry could be written. EdJohnston (talk) 06:25, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - she still has time to become notable, while at present she doesn't seem to be. Pundit|utter 00:50, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.