Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Millfields Charter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Physical restraint. (non-admin closure) Kharkiv07 (T) 22:50, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Millfields Charter[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG. Half the sources are about the problem that this group is trying to address. The other half are from a single publication, including some written by the founders of the group. (The BBC ref, like the first half of sources, doesn't mention the group by name.) I was unable to find anything better, and I can't think of a good target for a merge. I therefore believe that this group does not qualify for a separate, stand-alone article about itself, on the grounds that there aren't multiple sources that are both secondary and independent of the founders. WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:59, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The Millfields Charter is not yet mentioned even once at Physical restraint? Wouldn't that be an obvious target for merging? Martinevans123 (talk) 20:49, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Maybe? There's certainly a need for information about criticism there, but is this particular group important enough to mention by name? I don't really know. I'm always in favor of a good merge, though. WhatamIdoing (talk) 22:31, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to physical restraint and I would've merged and closed as such but considering I'm not sure how to merge any of this to that article, I'll wait but I found some links at Books and browser to easily suggest some sourcing. SwisterTwister talk 05:46, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to physical restraint. However, I see the sect at Physical_restraint#Misuse_and_risks_of_physical_restraints is completely unsourced. Perhaps some sources already present in this article, could be used to improve that sect. — Cirt (talk) 13:00, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.