Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miller's Crossing (Stargate Atlantis)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Stargate Atlantis (season 4). Closing as a redirect to Stargate Atlantis (season 4). Material is still available through the article history if someone has the urge to merge some of it. Joyous! | Talk 01:00, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Miller's Crossing (Stargate Atlantis)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable TV show episode. Delete and redirect to the episode list, as per the next one in the series, This Mortal Coil (Stargate Atlantis). Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:12, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:12, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:12, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Merge as no reason for deletion is given. I am unable to find more independent RS commentary than IGN, but there's nothing in here that should be deleted, rather than merged or redirected as is the norm for non-problematic NN content. Jclemens (talk) 02:25, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notability isn't a reason for deletion? Any merge would have to be highly selective, of course. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:50, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose it could be merged to Stargate Atlantis (season 4), but why bother? For individual episodes that article is largely just plot summaries. I suppose some of the Production information could be moved... Right now I'm inclined to agree with redirecting it. DonIago (talk) 21:16, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect- poorly sourced article consisting mostly of plot summary. I'm not convinced there's anything worth merging anywhere, but the title might be useful navigationally. Reyk _YO! 08:57, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.