Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Millennium Shakespeare

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 02:34, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Millennium Shakespeare[edit]

The article makes no assertion of notability, and after several months nobody seems inclined to demonstrate notability. Inasmuch as it has been deleted under a different spelling of the name (see afd), perhaps it should be speedied. —teb728 t c 06:45, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete appears to be a vanity project Paul75 (talk) 07:03, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Googles searches still uncover no reliable sources that would allow this project to satisfy the requirements of WP:N or the specific requirements of WP:BK. Nothing, apparently, has changed since the first AfD resulted in deletion. I can't see the article that was deleted then, so am unable to determine whether this qualifies for a G4 speedy. Deor (talk) 14:40, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- fr33k man -s- 15:05, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:BK. Schuym1 (talk) 23:50, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: still fails to demonstrate notability or otherwise meet WP:BK. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:10, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.