Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Millar Gough Ink

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Miles Millar. MBisanz ^talk 13:26, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Millar Gough Ink[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are... a heckuva lot of notable topics surrounding this, to the point where if there is any one of them that is somehow the most valid redirect I don't see any obvious reason why.

Coverage appears to be mostly or entirely passing mention (e.g., [1], [2], [3]) in connection with related subjects, but not about this company directly. Doesn't look like it's possible to write really anything beyond what's already there, just founders and list of connected works. No depth of coverage that I can find. GMG ^talk 17:35, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 03:48, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 03:48, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep production company behind many exceptionally notable shows and movies. FloridaArmy (talk) 14:52, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, yeah. But.. that doesn't mean there are any sources that treat them in any depth which can be used to write an article with. Notability is not inherited from related projects or people. GMG ^talk 14:55, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sources such as here discuss the collaboration in depth. Perhaps the title and focus on the company is the hangup. FloridaArmy (talk) 15:00, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's not an independent published source; it's a bio to promote one of their shows. Besides that, it only mentions the company in passing in a single sentence. It's about the people. The people seem to be clearly notable. But in order to establish notability about the company (and have anything to write an article with), we need sources that deal specifically about the company, and not things or people related to it. We need sourced that deal with the company in-depth, and not just passing mention. GMG ^talk 15:09, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:52, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Miles Millar and add link from Gough as well. The section can then discuss their collaboration and works produced. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:59, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep or redirect/merge?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 10:13, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to miles millar. Refs in the article are trivial. Szzuk (talk) 09:45, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.