Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mill Creek Mall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn per improvements, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 23:18, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mill Creek Mall[edit]

Doesn't appear to be a notable mall. A search for reliable third party coverage under both names turned up virtually nothing but directories and hotel pages -- not even mentions of the mall's closure could be found. The only sources cited are ICSC listings. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 21:19, 16 January 2008 (UTC) Withdrawn per Alansohn's improvements. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 23:18, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malls-related deletion discussions. -- Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 21:20, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment ~~A recent addition regarding a court case does add a hint of notability, but it still seems kind of trivial to me.~~ Already, Alansohn's adding some good stuff to this article. I'm still on the fence as to notability about the mall proper, but I'll leave this AfD open for further discussion. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 21:40, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I guess I was caught in the act, but the sources available and added to the article on a landmark free speech case at the mall, and other details re wetlands mitigation and the reconstruction project are supported by the reliable and verifiable sources needed to satisfy the Wikipedia:Notability standard. Alansohn (talk) 21:59, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.