The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 12:23, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable - no reason to have a page about one specific candy ad. -SCEhardT 20:24, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lol... I really love the "why this is pleasurable" section, though. --Dakart 20:50, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Completely NN. I agree with Dakart about "pleasurable" section (and may be fit for BJAODN). - Zepheus 20:58, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
