Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milford Magazine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 16:55, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Milford Magazine[edit]

Single sentence article about a small non notable regional magazine. Pegasus1138^{Talk | Contribs | Email} ---- 09:53, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The magazine's own web site claims a circulation of 15,000 and looks to be distributed for no cost. --Lockley 22:29, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep since standard notability requirement for print-related subjects is 5000. Monicasdude 22:57, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD is being relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that a decision may usefully be reached. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!
Mailer Diablo 15:33, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep I get a free newspaper every week on my doorstep called the "Penny Saver" which is entirely composed of paid advertisements. No matter how many people get it, it will never be notable. However, this magazine appears from its web site to be a bit more professionally done. I would like the article to be expanded, but in the meantime keep pending expansion is better than delete and recreate. I also notice that the article was a new editor's first contribution, and no one has bothered to add a note to his/her talk page. Thatcher131 20:23, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Lockley, as Monicasdude noted. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEMES?) 22:11, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.