Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mildred Pierce (disambiguation)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn I still think this dab's pointless, but meh. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 16:07, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mildred Pierce (disambiguation)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does this really need a dab? The song will never have an article, and the film can be linked from the novel with a hatnote. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 17:10, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There seems to be a trend of disambiguating for songs that will never (or should never) have articles and linking to the album page. When I'm trying to find out who did a song or which album it's on, having such dabs is not a bad thing.--chaser (talk) 17:18, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per Chaser's comments. While the song doesn't have an article, it's still a plausable search term. Lugnuts (talk) 17:30, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - useful for searching LadyofShalott 18:05, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - good for searching. Dale 18:14, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. TheWeakWilled (T * G) 22:28, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Useful for navigation. No benefit to deletion.--Michig (talk) 09:00, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.