Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milano Fernando

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Music1201 ^talk 07:38, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Milano Fernando[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable athlete Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:25, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Meets WP:NCRIC, point 3 - "has appeared in at least one World Cricket League match of Division Six status or above". He played in the 2008 ICC World Cricket League Division Five tournament. Here's a scorecard to show that. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 07:33, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Confirming WCL point of Lugnuts, Fernando meets the criterion. Regards, Naz | talk | contribs 11:15, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as passes WP:NCRIC point 3. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:55, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:56, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:56, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:56, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:56, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Lugnuts, as he appears to pass the WP:NCRIC requirements. Ejgreen77 (talk) 12:36, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As obviously meets WP:NCRICKET; the source provided by Lugnuts proves this. Omni Flames (talk) 12:36, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes WP:NCRICKET Point 3.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:16, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.