Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mikey jay
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 02:48, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Mikey jay[edit]
- Mikey jay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Apparantly autobiographical article of artist with only a blog and mixtapes and no published albums. Falcon8765 (talk) 23:33, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 02:30, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Maybe even A7 speedy - the only claim of notability is "internet attention" on YouTube, but there are no sources for this that I could find and the claim appears to be an outright exaggeration[1]. The blog isn't notable either; just another new musician wanting a Wikipedia page before actually doing something notable in the field. --Zvn (talk) 21:10, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete His only claims to "fame" are making a mixtape (hell, I've done that), having a blog, and posting a YouTube video (with a piddling 617 views when I checked. And actually calling it a video is pushing it; it's one of those music-over-a-still-image things). In other words, nothing of note. — Gwalla | Talk 23:02, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Just another kid youtuber and blogger. Has anyone noticed? Cite if so. Mangoe (talk) 13:57, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fails WP:MUSIC. Joe Chill (talk) 19:12, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, doesn't meet the WP:MUSIC notability criteria yet. Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:58, 28 December 2009 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.