Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mikel Gerle

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:24, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mikel Gerle[edit]

Mikel Gerle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertorially tinged WP:BLP of a person notable only as a former holder of a Mr. Leather title. This is not a notability claim that guarantees an automatic presumption of notability just because the person exists -- of all the past International Mr. Leather titleholders since 1979, just two others actually have Wikipedia articles, and they both have other notability claims much more substantive than IML alone. And for sourcing, all we have here is one primary source and one Q&A interview on a podcast -- which means we have zero sources that actually count toward passage of WP:GNG. Also conflict of interest, as the creator's username matches the name of the subject's husband given in the article body. Bearcat (talk) 03:49, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 10:55, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:04, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:04, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:04, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete nothing even remotely close to showing notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 07:28, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. No RS. No claim to meeting notability. Title is NN. Dlohcierekim 22:14, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.