Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Whaley (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 16:38, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Whaley[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Still not notable, mostly minor roles and virtually no coverage of this Mike Whaley. Praxidicae (talk) 13:35, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:51, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:52, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:52, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:52, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- Only one non- self published source and not even passing mentions in any other RS as far as I can tell. Nanophosis (talk) 16:06, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete borderline G4 territory. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 02:07, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NACTOR. The WP:SIGCOV is just not there. Newshunter12 (talk) 04:59, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.