Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Walker's Name Tag America

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 17:48, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Walker's Name Tag America[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable game. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:46, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Spam, no evidence of notability. Acroterion _(talk) 22:48, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. An affiliated external link, but no inline citations from reliable third-party sources.--Prodigy96 (talk) 22:50, 2 February 2010 (UTC)) User has been blocked, refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Trusted_Throw for details.[reply]

Delete Cannot find any third-party sources for the subject to establish notability. Could also fall under something made up one day. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 23:37, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 23:42, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Apart from the lack of notability, this is supposed to be a fun game? How the other half lives, indeed..... Per all the above. Peridon (talk) 23:51, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, lacks non-trivial coverage. JBsupreme (talk) 23:52, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per WP:MADEUP. Joe Chill (talk) 02:01, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weather forecast Anyone else think there's a possibility of SNOW? Peridon (talk) 17:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This is not a made-up game have submitted for Trademark it will be released and packaged as game in 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Louiscaverly (talk • contribs) 18:27, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If it's not released it comes underWP:CRYSTAL. Having a trademark doesn't indicate notability - just that someone has registered a trademark for something that may never even reach the market. And I can't see a market for this to need a trademark, anyway. Peridon (talk) 19:25, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.