Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Turner (political consultant)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 05:32, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Turner (political consultant)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I was able to check all but one of the sources, but they only mention the subject in passing, which does not count for notability. I did not turn up additional sources by searching. (t · c) buidhe 08:15, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. (t · c) buidhe 08:15, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. (t · c) buidhe 08:15, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions. (t · c) buidhe 08:15, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. (t · c) buidhe 08:15, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. (t · c) buidhe 08:15, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete sources need to say substantial amounts of things about a person, not just drop their name, for us to pass GNG. Turner may well be a very important political consultant, but if we do not have reliable sources talking about him substantially we cannot justify having an article on him.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:17, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:BIO. The references cited are not in depth, just small mentions. LibStar (talk) 23:22, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:TOOSOON. I expected to find more but nothing of substance turned up on Newsbank, WikiLibrary or Google. Cabrils (talk) 01:44, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.