Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Sullivan (ice hockey, born 1984)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 02:00, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Sullivan (ice hockey, born 1984)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable hockey player, fails WP:NHOCKEY, no evidence he passes the GNG. Played all but a single season of his career in the German minor leagues. One of a long string of NN stubs thrown up by article creator, without apparent attempt to provide sources which do not fail WP:ROUTINE, WP:GEOSCOPE or WP:IRS attesting to notability, as BLP articles require. Ravenswing 09:33, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:21, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:21, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:21, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:21, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Could not turn up any sources on this player to meet GNG and he fails NHOCKEY. -DJSasso (talk) 14:04, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. nn player. It's also hilarious that article creator couldn't even be bothered to mention the German teams he played for in prose. If "played in the ECHL" is your best argument for notability.... Reso lute 01:25, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.