Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Murphy (technologist)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – Rob ert 00:40, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Murphy (technologist)[edit]

Not notable. Seems to be a vanity page to promote this guy's website. FearÉIREANN\^(caint) 04:55, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as vanitisement. Royboy crashfan 05:01, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn (unpublished author) --Royal Blue 05:03, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Information in article is completely irrelevant. Subject is not notable anyway. Bobby1011 05:15, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Notable if he's published, but his incident doesn't appear to have garnered widespread attention. — Adrian~enwiki (talk) 05:40, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Violates WP:Vanity - nothing more than a blatant advertisement. --Hetar 06:37, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. Dlyons493 Talk 11:37, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, trivial local high school event and non-notable promotional article. Kuru ^talk 17:22, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable person with an axe to grind relating to his High School graduation. Don't people have blogs for this sort of thing? WP:BIO and WP:VANITY refers. (aeropagitica) 22:56, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per above. Chairman S. ^Talk 22:31, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.