Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Gasaway

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:53, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Gasaway[edit]

Mike Gasaway (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The page's only source at the moment is IMDb (which is why I can't just WP:BLPPROD it) and cursory Googling doesn't show very many other viable sources. Nathan2055talk - contribs 19:20, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 19:36, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 19:36, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete via WP:BLPPROD. IMDb is not a reliable source, and is in fact specifically called out as an unreliable source at WP:USERGENERATED. BLPPROD can be applied to an article with zero reliable sources. -IagoQnsi (talk) 19:44, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Upon closer review of WP:BLPPROD, I've realized I'm mistaken -- the reliable source bit only applies when removing the BLPPROD tag, not when adding it. Still, my opinion stands -- the article should be deleted for having no reliable sources and not appearing to meet the notability guidelines. -IagoQnsi (talk) 19:48, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as none of this satisfies WP:ENTERTAINER. SwisterTwister talk 06:00, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep his creative involvement with Emmy Award winning Back at the Barnyard and his Annie Award nomination for Jimmy Neutron: Boy Genius mean that notability guidelines are passed. Atlantic306 (talk) 02:43, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.