Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mikael Hagstrom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Closed with no prejudice against speedy renomination. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:31, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mikael Hagstrom[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

promotional bio of a non notable executive. Speaking on panels is not notability As for promotionalism, note the 3rd paragraph under SAS Institute. The existence of a paragraph like that shows the failure to understand the difference between an encyclopedia article and a press release.

The first reference, claimed as the Boston Globe, is actually a copy of a press release from Business Wire. Nothing else is even by appearance a reliable source for notability DGG ( talk ) 05:58, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:08, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:08, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^*poke* 00:37, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 05:05, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - first of all his last name was incorrect troughout the article. Anway, had he been an american businessman this article would have never been brought to AfD, just being real.--BabbaQ (talk) 13:54, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.