Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mihret Abebe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 12:01, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mihret Abebe[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page functionally has no sources. The one listed source is a non-working link. It appears that at best it makes a passing mention to Abebe. No sources that move anywhere near providing the indepdent, reliable 3rd party indepth coverage of her needed to pass GNG have been identified. John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:15, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:35, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:35, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethiopia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:35, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have tried correcting the problems mentioned below by John. I think the article no longer warrants deletion. Turtlewong (talk) 02:55, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:07, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Only one dedicated article fr/ WP:RS, other sources are neither. The search links at top yield no more potential sources. Time to go. Tapered (talk) 03:46, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Insufficient indicia of notability. Montanabw^(talk) 08:32, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep With 100,000,000 people in Ethiopia, in combination with the evidence of sources added to the article, topic satisfies WP:ANYBIO#1. Unscintillating (talk) 18:59, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as we've never considered location or whatever about it as a factor of notability, certainly not in modeling, and what matters is if there's independent notability, of which this article shows nothing but a mere pageant participation and its temporary involvement. WP:ANYBIO is a suggestive guideline, not policy, and that itself says there's no guarantee all subjects are notable. SwisterTwister talk 20:08, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:Basic and WP:ANYBIO Does not appear to be anything notable about the subject. Current sources do nothing to establish notability as 2 are not independent and one doesn't even mention subject.

Ethiopian Review -Press release bio. "Non-independent sources - Press Releases".
LinkedIn - self-published
My Kiru - subject not mentioned

G-searches is provides nothing of substance mostly social media sites and PR . CBS527^Talk 22:01, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.