Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miel de Botton

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. After a month, I am not spinning the wheel again to see if it gets more contribution. Stifle (talk) 08:20, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Miel de Botton[edit]

Miel de Botton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 21:03, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak Delete: A sources search turn up [1] (Evening Standard) as the only reliable third party source with extensive coverage (There's a Daily Mail article as well but it cannot be used for establishing notability). [2] Entertainment Focus establishes the existence of two records. There's unfortunately not enough substantial coverage, in particular for a BLP. A bit of a shame there isn't more, really. MLauba (Talk) 11:36, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note that I reduced the article to substub status and integrated the two sources above - this should make clearer what substantial coverage is left. Much of the previous content was closely paraphrased from her bio. MLauba (Talk) 11:49, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:22, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Joe (talk) 10:01, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:54, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.