Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midget House

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:21, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Midget House[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be made up or at least something new enough that it's not notable. PROD for such reasons was removed, only one source added, some unreliable blog. No significant coverage. — Timneu22 · talk 22:04, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just to note, "The Unreliable Blog" is the official blog of Fabric London. Fabric London IS one of the worlds leading clubs, dance music labels, dance music publishers and respected voices of the dance music scene. The venue has consistently been voted as one of the top 2 dance music venues in the world by mix mag and DJ mag and i believe the blog is the official opinion of the company. new References and articles have also been added. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.167.96.2 (talk) 13:22, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:43, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cirt (talk) 00:16, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ _―Œ^{♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣} 03:57, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: doesn't look to me like it's worthy of its own entry - it could be merged into House music at best. Whether or not a company "officially" wants to coin a term isn't really evidence of notability. NZ forever (talk) 05:53, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.