Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Micronesia–Spain relations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:36, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Micronesia–Spain relations[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. There is really almost nothing to these relations. No embassies, agreements, state visits. Article says trade is very "scarce". In the cooperation section, most aid is given to a group of island nations, including the example of aid given to Palau which is really scraping the barrel for relations. LibStar (talk) 23:33, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:12, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:12, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:12, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — Per rationale by LibStar. I’m in agreement with their assessment. Celestina007 (talk) 23:46, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - there's some material here, but it really needs a lot more - pretty sure its not out there. Deathlibrarian (talk) 03:09, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — Personally I think it's all been said by LibStar. Does not meet wp:gng, this article is not useful. This article does not discuss anything of notability or significance, standing in the shoes of someone who may wish to learn about this subject the article does not contain significant information at all and there is not much commentary out there on the subject to include. - Such-change47 (talk) 10:25, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete NO RS here to indicate notability of this article content.Deathlibrarian (talk) 07:52, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Per nom. the article does not meet notability. Alex-h (talk) 09:04, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:38, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.