Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Micronational Professional Registry
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 14:01, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Micronational Professional Registry[edit]
Non-notable crank website. JW1805 (Talk) 19:07, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Very Notable website to micronationals, and a sincere effort to establish standards of professionalism in the micronational community as well as a real micronational economy. Cranks, on the other hand, are notable for the very opposite reason: their lack of professionalism. --IndigoGenius 21:16, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable. Author's generalization is wrong. Cranks are often remarkably professional. Fan1967 22:11, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- At real art, or BS art? --IndigoGenius 15:36, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - NN. -- Omniplex 22:20, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable crank site Bwithh 22:45, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and User:Fan-1967. Angus McLellan (Talk) 12:39, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and others. Paddles 15:16, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- How kind of you not to view this as information for journalists. You act like I live off words, not money! I need advertising from someone else, someone in control of the airwaves, not Wikipedia, quite frankly. What makes you so powerful? I know of nobody that was obscure, and was helped by a Wikipedia article. Journalists in July will need to access this information all of a sudden, information about TTF-Bucksfan and the Fifth World Council, real world organisations, with real world people working for them, but if they make any comment about the information that is lacking, I'll tell them, on national TV, that Wikipedia isn't really an encyclopedia, and it isn't. It is just a bunch of envy-filled geaks that will talk about something when it already is, and thus they don't help democracy or global positive change in any way. They don't exist at all, for the purposes of democracy or positive global change through information, because the information you'll find there you can find elsewhere, and it is probably less biased. Wikipedia really doesn't deserve its nonprofit status. What makes a flat in Hurstville, Australia (read here), and that's all it is, more important than an Intercontinental Internet like the Cesidian Root, and the latter is just a corporation of my nation? Anyway, I won't give nothing, nothing at all to Wikipedia and its bosses, when I start that country out of thin air soon, and being a Wikipedia Admin won't get you a citizenship either! You won't be considered a professional, good enough to meet the standards of the Micronational Professional Registry, because if a professional information administrator thinks that the Cesidian Root doesn't deserve an article, but OpenNIC, a total joke, does, then anyone can run a Wikipedia, even I! I'm not breaking any rules here, or proposing articles that aren't already found in the Wikipedia, so if you are going to ax TTF-Bucksfan, then I demand you axe Atlantium, and virtually all the articles here. They don't have a more important nation. If you delete Cesidian Root, I'll demand similar treatment of the lesser OpenNIC. --IndigoGenius 15:36, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable. The JPStalk to me 21:15, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.