Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microburst (wresrler)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 12:16, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Microburst (wresrler)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

He does not exist. KzKrann (talk) 09:35, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 10:36, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 10:36, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. Apparently there is a citation which claims he does exist, so it's not a case of WP:HOAX. However, I'm voting to delete anyway because the article fails WP:GNG. I suggest the nominator alter his/her reason for deletion to this. — Richard BB 11:12, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - needless to say, if the article does get kept, the title needs fixing....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:55, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

KeepFound a source: http://www.wrestlingdata.com/index.php?befehl=bios&wrestler=27209 KzKrann (talk) 21:50, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment As I said above, he still fails WP:GNG. There's no evidence of notability here. — Richard BB 02:39, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:11, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I think that link just goes to prove that notability is quite some distance away. -- Whpq (talk) 22:05, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.