Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MicroEJ

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:54, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MicroEJ[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted and has no citations. A Google search reveals nearly no independent sources and most independent sources are nothing more than statistics about the company. I do not see multiple good sources for WP:GNG and this company also fails WP:NCORP. William2001^(talk) 19:29, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:30, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because it provides information on a company that has contributed to design millions of electronics devices, and is often viewed as the "tiny Android" of the embedded market. The first version of the page had some references from customers, and those references have been removed to comply with the rules of Wikipedia. Let us know if all is fine now. Thank you for your work at wikipedia
Alexandra —Preceding undated comment added 20:08, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexandra Doria: Hello. I believe that I have removed the speedy deletion tag a while ago. As you work for this company, you clearly have a conflict of interest, which does not mean your contributions are invalid, but are you being paid to edit? Thanks. William2001^(talk) 00:14, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not enough significant coverage in reliable independent sources to satisfy WP:GNG, WP:ORGSIG, WP:ORGCRIT or WP:CORPDEPTH - Epinoia (talk) 21:33, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.