Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mickey Meyer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:39, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mickey Meyer[edit]

Mickey Meyer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deleted in accordance with WP:A7 many years ago, more recently deleted via WP:PROD. I just restored it due to a request at WP:REFUND, but I'd like a community decision on whether it's a keeper. The article is poorly sourced at the moment. As a co-founder of Jash he might be notable, as are some of the other individuals associated with Jash, but as we all know, notability is not inherited. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:30, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Happy2018! (distænt write) 03:30, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment NOTINHEIRIT is not policy. L3X1 Happy2018! (distænt write) 03:31, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Actually, WP:NOTINHERITED is an explanatory supplement to policy (see the box at the top of the page), and as such, carries the weight of policy. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:22, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    This page is not one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. L3X1 Happy2018! (distænt write) 13:21, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:46, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:46, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:46, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 07:58, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:54, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete- I think not inherited is a valid argument, but putting that aside, I really don't see any significant coverage of him anywhere, just a quote here and there.--Rusf10 (talk) 06:57, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.