Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mick Wingert
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 23:27, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Mick Wingert[edit]
- Mick Wingert (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced BLP (technically, has his personal website and IMDb, weakly justifying removal of the sticky prod). "Best know for" role is voicework in an as-yet unaired TV series. Other credits are "additional voices" roles, producer in a redlinked production and such. SummerPhD (talk) 03:36, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom. Fails WP:ENTERTAINER as the subject per criteria #1 has not "had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." As a WP California member, I saw this AfD being created and saw the subject was from California. I looked as this IMDb entry which is sparse. Then I did multiple Yahoo/Google searches. He gets circulars hits but no reliable third-party sources. ----moreno oso (talk) 03:47, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, very little out there I can find. Hobit (talk) 13:59, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:31, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.