Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mick (screenplay)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:11, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mick (screenplay)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There may be an unproduced screenplay somewhere that merits an article, but this isn't it. It isn't even mentioned in the writer's article. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:58, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Mark the train^Discuss 16:12, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Mark the train^Discuss 16:12, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- unsourced since 2009, and, in any case, not independently notable of the author, Eoghan Harris. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:40, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:47, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Not least for the obvious WP:GNG issues. This article seems to stand as a showcase example of why we have WP:BKCRYSTAL notability criteria. Guliolopez (talk) 21:37, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.