Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle Xen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. slakr^\ talk / 10:14, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for music. This article may contain an excessive amount of intricate detail that may only interest a specific audience. Some or all of this article's listed sources may not be reliable. A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. (Note: AfD filed by User:Fathom1998)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 02:03, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I represent the artist and as a BLP she has requested it be taken down as per the WP policies on notability, conflict of interest. Thanks. We are happy to submit via official email. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fathom1998 (talk • contribs) 04:08, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure about the process here apologies, Wikipedia is not so easy for us not familiar with the many processes. I will remove the deletion tag I put up as it says "keep" in the message? Is that correct? This page sits really high in the search for my artist and we would like to sort it out either way. Thanks in advance! Fathom1998

The notice should be left on the article to advertise this discussion and allow others to participate. I will put the notice back up for you, and the discussion can continue here as to whether or not the article should be deleted. Thanks. Tgeairn (talk) 00:52, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This is a bit unusual, as the AfD notice has been removed from the article for some time now. The usual search for sources finds nothing to establish notability under WP:NENT. --Tgeairn (talk) 00:52, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, slakr^\ talk / 05:01, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Insufficient substantial coverage in multiple reliable independent sources to meet the requirements of any of our notability guidelines. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 14:00, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.