Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle Vito

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 12:02, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Michelle Vito[edit]

Michelle Vito (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: non-notable teenaged performer. Quis separabit? 10:49, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:30, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:30, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:30, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 07:27, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:56, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - according to Wikipedia she was part of the main cast of Aryana. She's also had supporting roles in Nita Negrita, Pagpag, and Sana Bukas pa ang Kahapon. As well as present supporting roles in Luv U and Someone to Watch Over Me. That should be enough to pass #1 WP:NACTOR. Rainbow unicorn (talk) 03:00, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom, does not appear to have had significant coverage in reliable sources. --Rubbish computer 11:19, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and Rubbish. Not enough cited material to show she passes either WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. Onel5969 TT me 13:16, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.