Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle Reid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 01:24, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Michelle Reid[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP that has been unsourced for over 6 years. She appears to be prolific but also appears not to have received any coverage. Michig (talk) 09:15, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 10:50, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 10:51, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have had a look for sources, and the only ones seem to be her self published bio, and those of her publisher and a third party bio. She seems to fail WP:Author. Also one (now removed) fact in her bio seems to be wrong as her name must be fairly common.Martin451 13:11, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Her most popular book by user holdings is approximately The Bellini Bride aka The Brazilian's Blackmailed Bride.[1] I found one "review".[2] It doesn't bode well for the rest of the books. Probably not every Harlequin romance writer is notable by Wikipedia standards. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 07:38, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.