Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle Manhart (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 07:48, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Michelle Manhart[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of enduring notoriety that would make this more than a BLP1E. A furore for posing in playboy does not really provide any basis for a biography and a minor fracas over protecting a flag isn't signifiant either. Together, its still inadequate. Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:58, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 22:01, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 22:01, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG, no lasting notability. Other military women mentioned on the page who posed for Playboy don't have pages. Mztourist (talk) 05:18, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails SOLDIER, also WP:BIO1E - no lasting notability. Perhaps there should be an article about the phenomenon of armed forces women posing nude and the results for their careers, but an individual article isn't justified. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 10:29, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this is a very clear violation of one event rules.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:19, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Has attracted significant coverage. Significant legal case. I understand that Americans want to sweep this sort of thing under the rug, but that is only more reason to keep the article. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:28, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.