Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle Mah

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Discussion has been open for nearly a month and nobody has voted to delete besides the nom (non-admin closure) Linguist¹ 1 ¹ 17:16, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Michelle Mah[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no real evidence of notability beyond a few interviews in San Francisco papers. Never in charge of a famous restaurant; never won any awards--except one as "rising star chef", which means "not yet notable." DGG ( talk ) 07:45, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:48, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:54, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep She has been featured (several times) in SFGate and also in Nation's Restaurant News, Restaurants & Institutions and her recipes were featured on the Today Show and ABC. Passes GNG, though her recipes are also reviewed in some of these sources, so she may also pass under CREATIVE. I added sources and cleaned up the references to the article. I also expanded it a little. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:22, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:09, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:19, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades^Godric 04:11, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - it's a marginal case, but from a news search, I think there's just enough coverage to write a full article about her. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 20:52, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per Megalibrarygirl. News sources here.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 21:51, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.