Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelangelo Galliani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:55, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Michelangelo Galliani[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Written by a single-purpose account that claims to be the copyright holder for the subject's work, likely an autobiography. Lots of sources, non-notable wards, but no significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Vexations (talk) 15:28, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 15:45, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 15:45, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete given the apparent COI and lack of independent sources. Balle010 (talk) 16:40, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment this one is hard to assess as most sources are in Italian. Downsides: the previous collections list included a lot of unverifiable material, which I removed. Possible upsides: I found a few mentions in the press, but I can't assess their value that well, as I have to do so through Google translate. The article is horribly promotional. 18:57, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
Delete a non-notable sculptor.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:09, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Does not pass notability criteria for artists. The fact that it is a promotional COI or AUTOBIO lowers credibility. Looks like a NARTIST and GNG fail. Netherzone (talk) 00:27, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.