Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Wood (cinematographer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 09:10, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Wood (cinematographer)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reviewed under New Page Patrol. No indication of wp:notability under GNG or SNG. of the references, one just mentions that he is a member of the organization, and the other two were written by him. Of the 4 works it says he is known for, 3 of the articles don't even mention his name and one just lists it. North8000 (talk) 02:38, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

These is some discussion on this at my talk page User talk:North8000#Michael wood deletion Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 03:30, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, unless substantial improvement and sourcing is forthcoming. The activities listed in the table (primarily second unit work and photography direction for individual TV episodes) do not rise to the level of notability. BD2412 T 06:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and United Kingdom. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:31, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.