Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Soldier

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:22, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Soldier[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:ENT: the one current reference is a promotional interview hosted on Mr. Soldier's personal website (NSFW). Looking for new ones, I found that he had also worked as a drag performer under the name "Precious Moments"[1][2][3] and performed in the rock band "Pepperspray"; however, I was unable to find in-depth biographical coverage (the three links above are brief and run-of-the-mill.) I don't believe his porn industry awards count towards anything now that PORNBIO has been deprecated. Cheers, gnu 57 03:03, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. gnu 57 03:03, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. gnu 57 03:03, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. gnu 57 03:03, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. gnu 57 03:03, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:40, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The nominator is correct about the subject's lack of non-trivial reliable source coverage. Gets local mentions as a minor San Francisco celebrity. The subject would not have passed any version of WP:PORNBIO in use since 2012. Fails WP:BASIC and WP:ENT without substantial RS interest. • Gene93k (talk) 12:05, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not even come close to being notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:04, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.